Looking for:
Microsoft offers free Windows Server licenses to VMware switchers | ZDNET
Adnan Mushtaq says 4 years ago. Hello, Please share the window server license price. Thank You. Shaun says 4 years ago. Karan says 4 years ago. Hi all, I want the link for windows server storage standard. Micro Indonesia says 3 years ago. Thanks for the Windows Server download link. Now my server is running again. Maria says 2 years ago. Shais says 2 years ago. Skip the license and use the evaluation for 6 months free. It will bypass the license.
Robert Lim says 2 years ago. Thank you for providing download link of Server Risnawati says 2 years ago. Poonkodi M says 2 years ago. The latest release of Hyper-V Server provides new and enhanced features that can help you deliver the scale and performance needs of your mission-critical workloads.
Get started with Hyper-V Server: R2 Windows Admin Center is a locally deployed, browser-based app for managing Windows servers, clusters, hyper-converged infrastructure, as well as Windows 10 PCs. Giving you full control over all aspects of your server infrastructure, Windows Admin Center is particularly useful for managing servers on private networks that are not connected to the Internet. Get started with Windows Admin Center. Windows Server Get started for free.
For example, Windows Server comes with an Active Directory feature that centralizes the user management of a business. Windows Server has existed for almost as long as the consumer Windows versions Windows 3. The first popular version of Windows Server was called Windows NT, which came in both server and client versions.
Before that, Windows was the client version, and Windows NT 4. Microsoft releases a server version of Windows OS, along with each client version. You can go through the complete list of Windows Server versions and timelines here. You can also read about the difference between different Windows Server editions here. In this article, we will discuss the different capabilities and features introduced in each version of Windows Server and their download link.
Since we can only point to official links from Microsoft, unfortunately, some very old versions of the OS are not available for download. Windows Server is the latest version of Windows Server, which comes as a hybrid platform, an on-premise server, and can connect to Microsoft Azure.
Core licensing is for Windows, not Hyper-V. Hyper-V is not a factor in your licensing discussion, only Windows and the hardware are. Take Hyper-V out of the discussion as it is just extra to talk about that doesn’t relate to what you are trying to ask. All Windows licensing is on the physical machines, that never changes.
There are two issues. The second is activating the VMs. There are three automated ways to activate the VMs. This is generally frowned upon because of the larger footprint and more complicated setup.
I know Scott said this already, but clustering is not a license function of Windows Server DataCenter edition. You license each server for the workload that will run there. Again that is only for what you have listed. But, just so you know host 1 and 2 shouldn’t even exist. How many Windows Server Datacenter licenses do you have, and do they include Software Assurance? I have a single server running Hyper-V Server , and it’s running 70 virtual machines, and can easily handle a lot more pending memory usage.
Typical densities are around VMs per host. Special cases can make it much higher or lower, but that’s the big part of the bell curve for two CPU systems today. Most offices only have one switch, so that’s a pretty huge single point of failure, yet people don’t mitigate that. That’s just means there’s like double the chance of a server going down.
If HA was needed, we’d have it. But it’s not needed or at least can’t financially make a case for it. If the server fails, it stays down until the part is replaced. If it will take too long, you spin up the replica if it’s worth the potential 30 seconds – 15 minutes data loss. This is a correct layout of what we currently have, host 1 and 2 he has setup as DC for the cluster because he states they need to be in there own domain.
Note this is not the domain our agency actually uses is more of a workgroup for the hosts and iscsi. They are physical boxes so they both are using 16 core licenses each as that is the min for a server. The word cluster is miss leading to me because although he says it is a cluster if we lose 1 of the host nodes we lose the vms that are hosted on them until we can attach the vhd and bring them online on one of the other hosts.
If the foundation is ok to be hyper-v server then it brings licensing to question for me. I may be reading it wrong but the jist seams to be that we dont license the hyper-v foundation, but we do insure that we have enough core licenses to cover those machines if audited.
We are a small agency and im pretty sure the over all server footprint we have is extremely bloated compared to what we actually need so I am hesitant to let him proceed now setting up a modern version of the older configuration.
We are working with r servers with 16 cores and 48 gigs of memory so nothing really good enough to handle more then 7 VMs max I would think. To clerify terminology “hyper-v core” was what I was told, when I hear core I think of the server core vs GUI install option. So those 4 hosts are hyper-v server, where as my thinking is we would need to be using server datacenter core instead, I understand it has a bigger footprint, but that is what my reading has pointed me to so far, which is what raised the questions about what he is actually doing and if it is being done correctly.
I think tommorow I will ask for some clerification since after re-reading this I am not certain he knew what he was talking about when providing the update today so I cannot say for certain that he installed server DC core or just the hyper-v server, on the 4 host nodes as he called them.
This is getting confusing. So you aren’t talking about “clustering” in the traditional sense – shared storage and all that? It seems like he is telling you what he’s doing, and you have absolutely no idea what’s going on. Then coming here and throwing around some of the terms you picked up from him talking about it, without understanding any of it.
What it’s starting to sound like, is he has a 2-node cluster consisting of Host1 and Host2. I don’t know what you mean as DC There’s no way he has a Domain Controller to run two nodes in a server cluster, that just doesn’t make any sense.
What he presumably means, is that he has host1 and host2 in a 2-node cluster that share storage by some means assuming iSCSI because you mentioned that. Where is the shared storage located? Is it on a SAN? It could also mean he has host1 and host2 set up to BE the shared storage That said, they should be in the main domain.
If you don’t have one, why not? The domain controllers can be VMs on the hosts in the cluster. It is cheaper to add RAM to a host than to add hosts once licensing costs are taken into account. It seems apparent that he is not talking about real clustering – one host fails, those VMs are offline until he moves the VHDs are moved. We are just getting what you’re picking up from the conversation – if we take what the OP is saying at face value, it definitely doesn’t seem like he knows what he’s doing.
The OP told us earlier in the thread that his tech installed two domain controllers – that’s why I wrote up my list above of hosts as I did. So yes, it appears that the tech installed two Domain Controllers using Windows DataCenter licenses – sigh.
This doesn’t require datacenter licensing. The tech has incorrectly informed the OP that the ‘cluster’ needs to be in it’s own domain, not part of the production Active Directory domain. This is totally wrong. Catalog Menu.
Windows Windows 11 Windows 10 Windows 8.
Windows Server | Eval Center.
This article describes the new Windows Server Licensing model per-core licensing Microsoft has implemented for its new server-based operating system. In addition to these changes many would be surprised to know that there is now a minimum number of Per-Core licenses required per physical CPU and Server :. Thankfully not much. Microsoft has adjusted its per-Core license pricing in such a way so that a small deployment of up to cores per physical server will be the same pricing as a Windows server 2-CPU License.
Get an award-winning backup solution for Free! Download Now! The price difference becomes apparent for larger customers with a server deployed that exceeds 8-cores per CPU and cores per server.
These customers will end up paying additional money for their licenses. Installing a Windows server Standard server means that the initial license will cover up to 16 out of the 48 cores and the customer will need to purchase additional licenses to cover the 32 extra cores!
The following table explains where additional licenses are required depending on the number of CPUs processors and cores per CPU. Figure 1. Microsoft offers its Windows Server in 6 different editions. Windows Server Datacenter : This edition targets highly virtualized datacenter and cloud environments. Windows Server Standard : Used for physical servers or environments with minimal virtualized requirements. It serves as a critical security component in protecting the transport key, and works in conjunction with other Windows Server components to ensure high security levels for Shielded VMs.
Figure 2. Windows Server Essentials : Ideal for small businesses with no more than users and 50 devices. This edition is also a great replacement for businesses running Windows Server Foundation as the same edition is not available for Windows Server Windows Server MultiPoint Premium Server : Allows multiple users to share a single computer while having their own applications and Windows experience and is suitable for academic environments. Windows Storage Server : Suitable for dedicated storage solutions.
This is a stand-alone product that runs directly on the bare-metal server and is built using the same technology as the Hyper-V role on a Windows Server Readers can also download here the Free Microsoft Windows Server Licensing Datasheet that provides additional useful information. The table below shows the licensing model adopted by each Windows Server edition:. Licensing Model. CAL Requirements. Windows Server Datacenter.
Windows Server Standard. Windows Server Essentials. Windows Server MultiPoint Premium. Windows Storage Server Table 1. Windows Server Editions and Licensing Models. The new Windows Server core-based licensing can be slightly tricky so make sure you know your hardware and license theory well! Back to Windows Server Section. Tags: Licensing Windows server per-Core per-processor datacenter standard essentials multipoint storage server hyper-v cost calculate.
Deal with bandwidth spikes Free Download. Web Vulnerability Scanner Free Download. Articles To Read Next:. Windows Server CAL. No CAL Required. Hyper-V Server
Windows server datacenter 2016 licensing free download
I purchased Windows Server Datacenter and other products and the download links I was given no longer work. There is a message to contact Microsoft for assistance.
When can I find the. If a volume key then you’ll need to get the distribution media from volume center logon to download. Regards, Dave Patrick Download Windows Server Evaluation days from Microsoft website, then use your product key to activate it, then evaluation version will become retail version.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact tnmff microsoft. Office Office Exchange Server.
Not an IT pro? Security TechCenter. Sign in. United States English. Ask a question. Quick access. Search related threads. Remove From My Forums. Asked by:. Archived Forums. Windows Server General. Sign in to vote. Hello, I purchased Windows Server Datacenter and other products and the download links I was given no longer work.
Thank you. Saturday, June 8, PM. If a retail product key then you can download here and activate. Monday, June 10, AM.
Windows server datacenter 2016 licensing free download.Windows Server
What he presumably means, is that he has host1 and host2 in a 2-node cluster that share storage by some means assuming iSCSI because you mentioned that. Where is the shared storage located? Is it on a SAN? It could also mean he has host1 and host2 set up to BE the shared storage That said, they should be in the main domain. If you don’t have one, why not? The domain controllers can be VMs on the hosts in the cluster.
It is cheaper to add RAM to a host than to add hosts once licensing costs are taken into account. It seems apparent that he is not talking about real clustering – one host fails, those VMs are offline until he moves the VHDs are moved. We are just getting what you’re picking up from the conversation – if we take what the OP is saying at face value, it definitely doesn’t seem like he knows what he’s doing. The OP told us earlier in the thread that his tech installed two domain controllers – that’s why I wrote up my list above of hosts as I did.
So yes, it appears that the tech installed two Domain Controllers using Windows DataCenter licenses – sigh. This doesn’t require datacenter licensing. The tech has incorrectly informed the OP that the ‘cluster’ needs to be in it’s own domain, not part of the production Active Directory domain. This is totally wrong. The OP indicated that his tech made a new dedicated Active Directory domain just for this ‘cluster’. I agree with Kevin, there was, is NO reason to make a new domain for this.
Kevin is also correct that RAM and storage added to current hosts are often able to extend current hardware. As mentioned in several of my other posts already,, there is zero need for a new domain just for this. You’re right, this isn’t a cluster in the form of auto failover or HA. It sounds like there is just shared storage – or at least likely shared storage. Hyper-V never requires licensing – it’s free, completely and utterly. You download the installer from the Microsoft Trial website but it’s not a trial, requires no key and never expires , then install on the hardware.
When you purchase Windows Server standard, it includes licensing for 16 cores. If you have a 16 core or fewer server, that’s all you need. If you have an 18 core or more server, you will need to purchase 2 core add-on packs for every 2 cores over This standard license grants you the rights to have two VMs on a single server.
Windows Server DataCenter license includes licensing for 16 cores on a single server. Like standard, if you have more than 16 cores, you need to purchase 2 core add-on packs.
Unlike standard where you are limited to two VMs per license, you get unlimited Windows VMs per license. Now, in your case, it appears that perhaps your vendor instead of selling you 6 Windows Server DataCenter licenses, they sold you only 2 core add-ons. But it does appear they sold you enough to cover all 6 servers worth of cores, so you are likely covered here.
Hyper-V is it’s own system, it’s not part of windows. The fact that you can install it as a role in Windows brings confusion to this point. There is no functionality difference. If Hyper-V is installed directly on Hosts , that is exactly what you want. Dashrender seems to have the closest understanding to the layout or information I was provided and given host 1 and 2 are domain controllers “DC” a primary and secondary at no point in this chain have I referred to Datacenter as anything other then Datacenter in order to prevent as much confusion as possible.
You are correct he is telling me what he is doing, but though technical terms are being used, they make no since and raise enough flags for me to reach out here. I have never setup a cluster myself just book smarts on how they are supposed to function and configured which is the cause for the flags.
So I am looking for validation from other people AKA you among the spiceworld to gain insight as to how this might look if correctly done to determine if it is something I can take on myself. We have established that when he told me hyper-v core he most likely meant hyper-v server so we can move past that. Additionally he has setup 2 domain controllers that so far Dash has me leaning to being un-needed.
Though Tim has provided at least one plausible reason as to why he has setup the domain controllers. So what I am looking for after all the useful information provided so far is, does it at all sound like my tech has a real handle on this project answer so far leans towards no. That being the case is this something that I can attempt to move forward using documentation and spicehead help to rebuild correctly leaning towards maybe , or most likely do I searching for a consultant.
Under all of that is are the total core licenses we have for server datacenter enough to cover all our physical servers answer seems to be yes.
But do you really even need this many hosts? This would not reduce the amount of licenses you need still 12 to 13 total, but could reduce power consumption noticeably, and give you some spare parts. Only testing will tell.
OK now that that is out of the way, You could purchase Datacenter licenses for the needed servers. This gives you the ability to move VMs around at will. But considering your current non HA setup, you can likely skip this. Also from a numbers perspective, DataCenter on it’s own is more expensive than multiple Windows Server Standard licenses if you need less than 13 VMs per server.
No my intent was to never give a plausible reason for AD DCs. I was trying to figure out what was going on. As far as I can tell, they are completely unneeded. I’ve seen no evidence of any clusters cluster meaning HA hyper-v cluster “Microsoft Failover cluster” using at least 2 nodes in the cluster.
I still don’t know if that’s what is being done or not. I think I got lost in this mess. Actually we have not established that. We’ve established what he should be using, but we don’t know because we just heard about “Hyper-V Core”. My guess is the Tech claimed MS failover clusters, but then never got it to work.
There is no product called Hyper-V. Most of additional features of Windows Server Datacenter don’t matter to most users, but the difference is not just the virtualization rights. This will put your mind at ease if the all clear comes back and will give you definite questions to ask if not. You may not be technical nout wrong with that but you need to put your manager hat on at a jaunty angle, but firmly, and get to the bottom of matters. I have never setup a cluster myself and outside of seeing working labs at other locations, vendors, and even professional friends houses so I fully admit this is most likely over my head abit but i can reach up when the need calls for it.
I only have book and web based knowledge about what one is supposed to look like and how it is supposed to function and what he is telling me and setting up is no where close I thank you all for the validation of that provided threw-out this post , but I also will admit that generally the practical design, setup and configuration lets call it standards established by that documentation sometimes deviates.
Since I am sure there are multiple ways to skin this cat. So that is what fueled this post my ignorance in the best practices when it comes to setting up a cluster of servers and that underlying feeling that the information he has been feeding me is BS and not anything near accurate to the original upgrade proposal.
Which leaves me trying to determine if this is something within reach of my experience with the assistance of spiceheads and web resources that I can step up and correct, or do I call in big guns and hope I can learn along the way. This topic has been locked by an administrator and is no longer open for commenting.
To continue this discussion, please ask a new question. Your daily dose of tech news, in brief. We’ve made it to Friday, everyone! I hope everyone has a great, fun, and relaxing weekend! But before you start checking out, let’s jump into today’s Snap! You need to hear this. The bit about getting the “horse” planted reminded me of how vulnerable we all are to that kind of attack vector. Thank goodness my company doesn’t design jet engines! Summer has faded more and the march towards fall is nearly over.
The days are shorter, the nights cooler, of course depending on where you live. Hello, I work for a small business, and in order to become NIST compliant we are looking to implement 2 factor authentication.
Have any of you gone through this process before? What resources or companies did you I realize the general topic has been discussed many a time here on SpiceWorks. What I’m pondering about now is with our current system.
I like it, but it’s running out of space. It’s a small business, so it worked fine for the previous IT guy, but we’re Online Events. Login Join. Windows Server. How to Buy Pricing and licensing for Windows Server. Windows Server is the platform for building an infrastructure of connected applications, networks, and web services, from the workgroup to the data center. It bridges on-premises environments with Azure, adding additional layers of security while helping you modernize your applications and infrastructure.
Get started with Windows Server: R2. Windows Server Essentials edition is a cloud-connected first server designed for small businesses with up to 25 users and 50 devices. If you are considering installing any version of Windows Server Essentials, we would encourage you to consider Microsoft Hyper-V Server provides a simple and reliable virtualization solution to help organizations improve their server utilization and reduce costs.
The latest release of Hyper-V Server provides new and enhanced features that can help you deliver the scale and performance needs of your mission-critical workloads. Get started with Hyper-V Server: R2 Windows Admin Center is a locally deployed, browser-based app for managing Windows servers, clusters, hyper-converged infrastructure, as well as Windows 10 PCs.
Giving you full control over all aspects of your server infrastructure, Windows Admin Center is particularly useful for managing servers on private networks that are not connected to the Internet. Windows Server Datacenter. Windows Server Standard. Windows Server Essentials.
Windows Server MultiPoint Premium. Windows Storage Server Table 1. Windows Server Editions and Licensing Models. The new Windows Server core-based licensing can be slightly tricky so make sure you know your hardware and license theory well!
Back to Windows Server Section. Tags: Licensing Windows server per-Core per-processor datacenter standard essentials multipoint storage server hyper-v cost calculate. Deal with bandwidth spikes Free Download.
In addition to these changes many would be surprised to know that there is now a minimum number of Per-Core licenses required per physical CPU and Server : A minimum of 8 core licenses is required for each physical CPU. A minimum of 16 core licenses is required for each server. A 2-core license pack is the minimum amount of core licenses you can purchase.
