Construction sector in Europe 2018

Construction sector in Europe 2018

As defined for this paper, soft power reflects the ability to define and shape the narrative and thus be viewed as legitimate. The data show that both the EU and China are gaining https://developersite.org/building-the-future-euroinvests-recipe-for-client-oriented-development/ soft power through the Pelješac Bridge project. In terms of general approval, proximity to the construction site increased positive opinions of both the EU and China.

  • He developed scientific research mainly on the general theory of elasticity, stability of elastic equilibrium, response to dynamics and elastoplastic vibrations, shell structures, solutions for steel and reinforced structures.
  • It is also disingenuous to talk of the “alignment of investment, standards, equipment and materials between China and Europe.” It would be more accurate to identify the project as combining EU investment and standards with Chinese equipment, materials, and labor.
  • Marchand said that overall, EU total construction output amounted to €1.24 trillion in 2015 – an increase of 2.4% compared to 2014.
  • The use of temporary agencies, subcontracting and posting of self-employed workers gives rise to additional problems.
  • These subsidies, including the costs of imported labor, undermine the “market rules and the regulations” that apply to EU companies.

Prof. Jan W.B. STARK, from the University of Delft, The Netherlands, had made substantial contributions to the construction industry in general, and more specifically with regard to steel and composite structures. For many years, he had been an active member of CEN and served ECCS in various committees. The Charles Massonnet Award was presented to him to express our gratitude for his high standard and valuable contribution to the steel construction industry. Gerhard SEDLACEK, was a leading and opinion-forming person in various ECCS technical committees and subcommittees.

WebFederal Financial Institutions Examination Council

Two-thirds of respondents thought that the Chinese company built the bridge for less money than an EU company would. Most of the last third believed there is no difference in price between an EU and Chinese company. Only five percent of respondents from the national sample responded that an EU company would have been cheaper.

Why digital construction software is the right tool for collaboration and construction management

Other key attributes of contractors, such as country of origin or ownership structure, are also excluded from data collection. This information would be extremely useful when conducting a deep analysis of EU spending, and it is necessary to evaluate successes and identify future issues. Of greater interest is the interplay between the Pelješac Bridge project and public opinions of the EU and China. While Croatians in general felt positively about the EU, the awareness that the EU helped fund this project increased this positive attitude. Similarly, the positive attitude was significantly stronger in the community around the Pelješac Bridge than in the general population. Significantly, while the attitude toward China was neutral in the general population , it was mostly positive in the two regional samples and became more positive the closer a respondent was to the construction site . While there are demographic and educational differences in these regions compared to the general population, data suggest this finding is not simply correlation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

WELCOME TO RAK GROUP

0